<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-discovery errors take toll on judges, too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/06/04/e-discovery-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/06/04/e-discovery-errors/</link>
	<description>A Daily Record blog devoted to Legal Affairs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Publicus</title>
		<link>http://mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/06/04/e-discovery-errors/#comment-1844</link>
		<dc:creator>Publicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/06/04/e-discovery-errors-take-toll-on-judges-too/#comment-1844</guid>
		<description>The more interesting part of the opinion was Judge Grimm's discussion of variations in ESI search methodologies.  I doubt there is anyone out there (here) who did not already know that federal judges resent laywers transferring ESI discovery burdens to courts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more interesting part of the opinion was Judge Grimm&#8217;s discussion of variations in ESI search methodologies.  I doubt there is anyone out there (here) who did not already know that federal judges resent laywers transferring ESI discovery burdens to courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
