<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNA: What are the odds?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/07/25/dna-what-are-the-odds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/07/25/dna-what-are-the-odds/</link>
	<description>A Daily Record blog devoted to Legal Affairs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LT</title>
		<link>http://mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/07/25/dna-what-are-the-odds/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>LT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/07/25/dna-what-are-the-odds/#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>Statistics are derived from available data.  Before Three Mile Island and Chernobyl the liklihood of a meltdown at a nuclear plant was estimated at about one in a billion.  Then came the events that changed everything.  DNA matching is a relatively new field and the statistics are still evolving.  What will that mean for future juries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Statistics are derived from available data.  Before Three Mile Island and Chernobyl the liklihood of a meltdown at a nuclear plant was estimated at about one in a billion.  Then came the events that changed everything.  DNA matching is a relatively new field and the statistics are still evolving.  What will that mean for future juries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
